The Internet uses 9.4 % of electricity in the US, 5.3 % worldwide
Equipment powering the internet accounts annually for 9.4% (or 350 billion kWh) of the total electricity consumption in the US, and 5.3% (or 868 billion kWh) of the global usage.
That's from a research conducted by David Sarokin at Uclue, an online pay-for-answers service. The figures cover computers and monitors (roughly two-thirds of the total), data centers (one-eight) as well as networking and transmission equipment. They do not cover the energy that goes into producing and distributing computers and equipment, nor that powering printers and other non-communicating devices. Also, left out is the fast-growing non-computer set of Internet-enabled devices, such as PDAs, smartphones, etc. Sarokin has published the details his calculations, and for what I can judge they look generally accurate -- although of course a generous margin of error should be considered, given the difficulties inherent with such a calculation but also specific elements such as, for example, the relative growth of laptops (they consume less than desktops) etc.
Even allowing for such a margin, these figures are huge, and they underscore an untold reality: the supposedly immaterial information economy runs on significant infrastructure and requires significant energy. The idea that an average Second Life avatar consumes about as much electricity as an average Brazilian is not just the stuff of urban legends. And energy consumption is spiking upwards. According to a Sept 2006 report by IDC, today every dollar invested in computer hardware in data centers entails 54 cents in energy costs; IDC projects this figure to grow to 71 cents by 2010, and 1 euro by 2012.
(Cross-posted from LunchOverIP)

5 Comments
This figure is clearly wrong. Similarly erroneous figures have been debunked at extreme length in the past, see:
http://enduse.lbl.gov/Projects/InfoTech.html
for more. I am actively engaged in work on this topic; anyone who has data is encouraged to contact me -- BNordman@LBL.gov . I would discourage characterizing energy use of "The Internet" as the sum of the consumption of any device connected to it -- I think this confuses rather than enlightens people. More useful is to report the consumption of key types of devices, such as network equipment, servers, storage, PCs, displays, etc.
--Bruce
This must be wrong. For one thing this survey cannot possibly understand what percentage utilization my computer and monitor is when connected to the Internet. Besides my power consumption is already monitored and reported in other locations. Let's try to come up with some more realistic numbers. -doug
It may be 'wrong' but it might still be useful, if only for provoking some discussion about what the real figure is - what we want to measure, and how, and what we can then do with that information. Doug's right that simply including the electricity consumption of my laptop because it is connected to the network doesn't really help - but it is a starting point.
The real danger is that this 5% figure is nice and round and easy to remember, so it is likely to become folklore, reproduced in innumerably powerpoint presentations around the world and never updated. One of the useful things we can do on wattwatt is, of course, ensure that better figures are both calculated and known about!
I agree, this is only a starting point. However, Bruno's assertions were not presented in this manner.
If we are interested in learning just how much power is consumed in Internet matters we can only make estimations based on spot checking and auditing "typical" users. And don't forget that the Internet is orders of magnitude larger than just the world wide web. I may be wrong but it is very likely that email alone is the largest piece of the pie. -doug
By the way, I have two monitors and both are flat screens. One is used whereever I go and the other is used intermittently. The question is, "Am I a typcial user?" The answer is "Maybe." -doug