CHANGING to LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL in JAPAN
Japan National Police Agency decided to change traditional tube type traffic signal to LED type for arterial highway from next year by gradation.
There are roughly 2 million traffic signal systems in Japan, and Japan government supports 1/2 changing expenditure for regional government. Now 10% of all systems was changed to LED type already, but the cost of LED type is 1.5 times expensive than traditional tube type.
Just like in sun set time or dark rainy day, sometimes it is hard to recognize the color of traffic signal in traditional tube type, but in LED type it is clear to discern the signal color. So the traffic accidents were reduced about 30% in the searching during 2001 to 2005, and the LED advantage is generally recognized in Japan. The merits of LED type are as follows.1 Traffic accident is reduced.2 The electric power consumption is 1/6 of tube type.3 The life time of LED type is 6 to 8 years, and tube type is 0.5 to 1 year.4 These merits contribute exactly preventing warming climate. Well I read the IPCC 4th Report, I think that we have to do every thing what we can do now, in our home, in our office and in our society. And I think we have to link arms in our earth.
lighting
| electricity
| led
| traffic signal

3 Comments
An article written by Noboru KUBO , Tatsuya KOBAYASHI , Sou KITAJIMA and Toshihiro ARAI on the subject of active safety. The article, entitled "LED Traffic Signals on Motion Pictures of Drive Data Recorders" pointed out a possible issue with LED traffic signals:
"LED (light emitting diode) traffic signals that have recently been replacing the current bulb signals in Japan have several advantages such as longer life, less power consumption, and no pseudo-emissions due to reflections, etc. The authors, however, found that scenes with LED signals turned off for seconds were sometimes captured in the motion pictures taken by drivedata recorders (DDR's) because the flicker cycle of the LED lamps synchronizes with the frame rate of DDR's. The phenomenon can make it impossible for an analyzer of traffic accidents to determine the state of traffic signals. This article presents the cause of the phenomenon and some possible solutions. The authors hope that all the manufacturers and handlers of DDR's will pay attention to the problem."
As we become more and more safety conscious, I realise that there's often a compromise needed. As an example, I take the case of Xenon bulbs used in car headlights. The light is bright, strong, well directed and much more efficient than that of the traditional headlight. As a pedestrian I'm glad to know that drivers will spot me rapidly. However, as a driver when I'm confronted with a pair of these modern efficient safety elements, I know that for the following seconds, as my eyes readjust, I'll be temporarily blinded, confronted as I am with a pair of black dots caused by the high contrast in luminance.
So I ask the question, is it better to be seen or to see? And, of course, there's no correct answer...
This articlećwas reported in Japan Economy Newspaper(NIKKEI) on November 21.
So I did'nt know these auteor and also I thought that this article was reported by Japan National Police Agency.
Well the LED traffic signal lights are strong and clear in spite of day, night and weather.
#3 by Simon Powell on December 4, 2007 at 1:03 p.m.
You could easily resolve the issue of the DDRs by having dual circuits, so that not all of the LEDS are off at the same time. So long as the frequency is higher than the persistence of vision it will look the same. There was a novel idea with headlamps that moving into the ultraviolet region and producing flourescing road markings would reduce the dazzle whilst also improving visibility of the road signs. I think they got the idea from herds of moose in Scandinavia, who happen to fluoresce.